投稿者: taka8taka8

It can easily be tracked down; the evolutionally mutations of whales.
You can just put fossils or specimens of cetaceans (whales) along the time axis in an order from the oldest to the present. Then you can see the animation movie of the evolution of whales with the millions or billions of time span compressed in just a few seconds.

Starting from 4 (four) legged land animal, you can observe the appearance of the series of fossils continuously mutates; the legs get short, fingers closes and unified into fin like shape, hind legs turned into something of dolphin. So detailed and tangible is the geometrical relations and links between a fossil and the next in a time period that there is no doubt that whales evolved from land animal.

On the other hand, human, tracking down its evolutionally mutation is not so clear, it seems, as there are some academics who are still seeking fossils that depict the gradual shift of geometrical shape. Between Neanderthal and Modern Human any fossils have not been found which could represent the gradual evolutionally mutation throughout such a long period of time as millions.

Therefore, the biological mutation of human from Neanderthal to Modern Human happened in an instantaneously like metamorphosis. Oh!!!!!! What a great theory it can be!

Oh my god! Wait! Such a crazy some idea! How could that happened, can you see?!
Is that a new Hollywood movie titled “Theory Impossible!”?

It was around 20 years ago when I was working power plant construction project in Australia, one of my Australian colleagues said, “I seriously believe that human is originated from space”. Then I said, “OK, tell me the point”.
“Yes, there are no fully convincing evidence in understanding that modern human originates from such animals like apes. I think that long time ago, somewhere in prehistoric era, multiple races of extraterrestrials landed on the Earth and settled in several locations that’s why now we see many races in the world”, he firmly declared.

Note: in this article, any effect of alcohol is neglected, like friction force in mechanical physics for some beginners.

Having been stimulated with his transcendence theory, I developed another drunken hallucination. (Though another voice in my spirit said; “Don’t !”)

At that time, a single race of extraterrestrial found this beautiful Earth and thought that they want to live on the planet instead of being confined further in their space-habitat because there is no such beautiful thing as ones being on the Earth in their habitat, in spite of almost perfect and flawless functioning of the system of the space habitat with their ultimately advanced science and technology.

However then, they felt sad with a fact that they can never directly land on and live on the Earth because their DNA can never adapt to the Earth. To have DNA adapted, the DNA must experience long period of DNA functioning in the very environment of the Earth. It’s like trying to speak mother tongue in another country where there is no translator nor interpreter nor any knowledge that can connect together the two languages.

Anyway, so advanced is their science and technology that they found quite a surprising solution. “Why don’t we synthesize new DNA from both DNAs?” “One from ours, the other from Neanderthal’s.” They were quite being respectful of the DNA on the Earth with its long time development process, which can never be substituted with another one therefore the only way they can realize the same capability was to share the power rather than newly generating something another.

The newly synthesized DNA was applied somehow in Neanderthals reproduction system and, The new race, that would be the ultimate ancestor of modern human, was borne.

This is the very reason that evolutionally mutation process of human cannot be traced along time axis while for whales it can be.

Oops!, I did it again———-.

But, such things as racism, war, etc. are all inferior to my illusion, don’t you think?

He suggested to Einstein that space-time would be composed of five dimensions while Einstein was stating that space-time would be four dimensional.

Einstein said that normal space is three dimensional. That is typically expressed in mathematics as X, Y and Z.

Then one more dimension should be added. “Time”.

One day, one mathematician whose name was not so known well among academics at that time sent a short thesis to Einstein. There being described was general relativity based on not 4 dimensions but 5 dimensions that happened to reach Maxwellian equations for electromagnetism.

Einstein then encouraged him to publish the theory which later is developed into Kaluza–Klein theory. Klein is a Swedish theoretical physicist. They developed the theory.

Yes, at that time, Gravity was getting closer to Electro-Magnetism.

But, it was like small fire suddenly blight burned but then disappeared somehow. Instead, being left was excitement among academics seeking quantum mechanics. Until theory of string emerges, the idea of adding further dimension had been in hibernation.

Now a days, physics is quite a complicating thing but it also looks (to me) that physics has come to a deadlock. May be here the present being required is an idea, innovative and not deeply be “contaminated” one.

Like The Laws of Thought by George Boole, which now is the fundamental of computerized system, some ideas quietly and modestly alive may finally be of salvation to modern physics.

Today, my story is quite fell short of in terms of both length and consideration thus if someone who is professional in the field of physics read this, please just leave me as I am. I am just an innocent science-fiction-loving ordinally middle aged man.

Finally, I have to leave here a short statement for Ukrainian people.
Although nobody could stop it, we have to at least continue thinking of the way that can eliminate any form of war. At least we can say that some persons who are taking the situation seriously have started thinking of how to create peaceful world.

In the book, found in its afterword is a short comment on human being by Mr. Lorenz, the author of the book. The comment, I can slightly remember but not exactly, states something about concerns over the human being who now posses mass destructive weapon.

He is an ethologist.
His concern is, whether human being can control such power of mass destructive weapon like wolves do.

Wolves form a herd and sometimes a young wolf challenges the leader of the herd.
But, often the young one is overpowered by the leader. In the final point of the conflict or say the battle between them, the challenging is put to end with the ferocious jaws of the leader freezing at its position posing the finish-bite around the neck of the challenger.
The leader anyway never bite the neck.

Losing a member of the herd means losing some extent of capability of hunting a prey.
But at the same time, hierarchy should be kept consistently and firmly.

Here then another type of animal. A kind of deer, (I forgot the name ….. ) which does not form herd in wild circumstance.
If some of the deer are put in a fenced area, a male starts killing all the other deer including female and fawn with its own horn.

In wild circumstance, the deer are well spread in a wide area keeping distance with others in a way that there is no competition over food.
But once the distances are no longer kept in that manner, food competition is inevitable.
So reasoned as above is the behavior of the male, in ethological theory.

We human being need others. If we put the above theory of wolves on us then, how the description of Ukraine war can be?

Russian so far have not killed all the Ukrainian people while demonstrating its power.
Is this situation the same as the chief of the wolves do?

No, No! No!, never be the same!

OK then, if Russian just had threatened Ukraine by demonstrating huge armed forces assembled ready for war at the border of the countries, would the war not have broken out? Like wolf chief with its jaw poised to bite.

No, No! No! again never!

OK then, Could Russian be allowed to kill Ukrainian completely so that any competitions over something is eliminated, like that story of deer as Mr. Lorenz exemplified?

OK, no more, that’s impossible, me myself, such a fool!

First of all, human being can never be the same as those wild animals.
The way, so called war, no more fits to this globalized world.
If Mr. Lorenz examined modern human behavior in a way any ethologists do, then he would say, human now have thrown away the method “war”.
He would say, killing people by the name of war does not match with wolf’s jaw or deer’s horn.

We human being now has reached an area beyond ethology.

Mr. Lorenz, please tell us how to built a world order that can completely eliminate any form of war. We could not find any clues from your fascinating studies rather are still being in vain.