Refeeding syndrome, Hypothermia and humanity

They knew it, somehow, though at that time any scientific or medical knowledge about it had not been shared or even established yet.

Simply say, it is danger to give a person, who is in starvation state, well-nourished food. That is refeeding syndrome.

And it poses a degree of risk on life if a person who shows hypothermia is given heat directly. Often the person shows a kind of shock and dies.

In Japan, during samurai era, some samurai warrior might have possibly known refeeding syndrome, guessing from their diary.

Also in Japan, there is a recode around late 18s about large scale tragedy of a marine accident with more than 100 fishermen died and just a few survived. The survived were saved by people in a tiny island and then the people knew something of how to treat hypothermia and how to avoid refeeding syndrome although in that era in Japan any knowledge about those medical issues did not exist at all. Maybe they attained experiential knowledge throughout their own history of saving life.

I read a nonfiction novel about 33 men trapped in copper mine in Chile. In the story, prevention measure of refeeding syndrome was being described. I remember slightly a short explanation about the knowledge of refeeding syndrome. It states that the knowledge was officially acknowledged through experiences on medical treatment for POW during WWII. (US army officers and soldiers captured and maltreated by Japanese army…… I must admit it.)

Anyway, here what I want to make remark on is the fact that some people had already known it well before the knowledge is well established in scientific manner.

You see of course some kind of knowledge can be obtained through experiences especially in case the knowledge is quite tangible but for refeeding syndrome normally people who try to save the life of starved person will obviously tend to give the person nourishing food as simple conclusion.

How can a person be aware of the risk? There in their hand is the food that normally gives human the power of survival! They would think, “Yes! You can eat it now and gain a strength!”

As for hypothermia as well, how can a person be aware of the risk in providing heat from such source as bonfire. The person simply sees the necessity of giving warmth to the patient’s body. And then if the patient has died, the person would think that it would have been too late simply rather than having doubt of the way of giving warmth.

In that incident of fishermen in Japan, the people in that tiny island found some fishermen who drifted on the coast. And the islanders brought the fishermen in their shacks, there their wives and grown daughters, naked, laid their body contacted to the fishermen’s body so that their natural and biological heat transferred to the fishermen’s body then after all hypothermia is avoided. They didn’t apply the heat of their bonfire though actually at that time they had bonfire to get their shack warmed. Instead, they used voluntarily their body heat, though the people whom they were trying to save were all unidentified strangers.

When the islanders found the fishermen keeping their strength, if not fully being recovering, they gave them warm water with red clay soil dissolved, though the fishermen’s urge for food. Then a few days later, they started giving them light food, a kind of soup.

How could they know the way?

Assuming that long time ago before they attained the knowledge, they would have found some persons on the coast, what would have happened have been leading to that knowledges?
Since each family would have lived in very small shack, they would have decided that one family would taken one person to its shack. Some family would have been able to afford having bonfire while others not. At that time such islanders would have been suffered from a condition somewhat close to poverty, if not being died of it. So, some family would have used their bonfire, others, since at that time they had used to sleep every night with family members all together huddled to share their warmth instead of bonfire, would have applied their body to give the persons warmth.
Then the next morning they would have found a fact that some persons survived and others not. Therefore they would have found a fact that all survived were ones taken to a family who did not use bonfire.

In case of refeeding syndrome, assuming that some family did not afford any food, what would ——-, no, that is impossible. The family alive that means they have food.
So, —–, how about this;
Some applied nourishing food, some applied minimal light food, some gave the patient only water served in wood tray, some provided it in a tray improvised with red clay soil.

Now a days, scientists often undertake so called control experiment. For instance, when the objective of a science research is to verify the existence of photosynthesis, they carry out multiple experiments. In one, they would leave a leaf of tree as it is, in another they cover a leaf with non-transparent sheet. Then after a period of time, they put some chemicals on these leaves. The chemical of course as you know can detect the existence of starch. The result is apparent.

I am not sure of this kind of story, especially of the reason why the islanders came to know that. Anyway, as far as their behavior is concerned, it can be valued as power of humanity and therefore now, entering such an era of technology, any scientific and technological activities should always be started and established from and with humanity, otherwise anything comes from the activities will be of life threatening.

How about this. If peaceful families from another countries worldwide moved in Ukraine and lived there next to next with Ukrainians and then helped them with daily life, production as raising wheat, with revival activity for war torn area instead of giving them weapons even though Russian offensive continued (but perceiving the war as a kind of natural disaster so once offensive has started, they all would take refuge to shelters), then even with the targets not only their enemy but also peaceful families from the world would Russians further continue their offensive? I mean, this kind of behavior can be a parallel of those islanders who lay next to fishermen to give them biological warmth. No! No! No! How can on earth peaceful families move in such a dangerous war zone and consider the war as natural disaster?
IMPOSSIBLE!
Or perhaps people who actually need to be saved with such way of salvation could be Russians.

Brownian Motion, how has such an issue of “looking like Random” been logically treated?

When I was an elementary school student, I learned it on science encyclopedia. Mr. Robert Brown, a botanist, born 1773, found the phenomena.
He observed through microscope a strange movement of pollen on the surface of water. He, then, verified that it is not driven by something of biological.

Several scientists or academics have attempted to build a theory and mathematical model of this strange phenomena, namely Thorvald N. Thiele, Louis Bachelier, Albert Einstein and Marian Smoluchowski.

For something looks like random, a theory and mathematical model, is it possible?
Yes! Possible!

One of our teachers (I call him so on my own selfishly) Mr. Einstein, applied “probability density function”. Probability! Once I had an impression of ambiguous with it but actually having grown through a life of an engineer, I can somewhat share a degree of rationality in applying probability.

To my surprise, by Mr. Einstein’s theory determined are the size of atoms, and how many atoms there are in a mole, or the molecular weight in grams, of a gas. Mr. Einstein once stated that God doesn’t play dice. But then what about Brownian Motion?

If such process as calculation of the size of atoms etc. works properly even with probability, then there is nothing like “dice” in the process. Hereunder being put is the reference to an equation on Brownian motion from the famous Wikipedia

That famous discussion on quantum theory was won by Copenhagen. Then the concept of probability in quantum physics has been “temporally” accepted though many academics are still thinking of it as an issue, saying that maybe another further sophisticated way rather than relying on probability can never be ruled out.

In the above reference equation, you see symbol Φ as probability density function, which was also the main focal point in that discussion on quantum theory. In Schrödinger equation, Φ symbolizes wave functions of the electron and it does not say exactly the location of an electron rather describes what can be observed. In this regard, introducing probability gives us a degree of rationality.

So, let’s return to the topic “Brownian Motion”. In the phenomena, atoms intermittently hit the pollen. So many patterns of hit and run. At that time, when I found it on scientific encyclopedia I thought that it might be possible of air flow rather than movement of atom.
Also I was wondering that how Mr. Robert Brown was getting aware of it as something worth enough to consider. Anybody may even not notice it!

Indeed, I have forgotten about “Brownian Motion” until I have recently surfed websites about Fractal for my blog. https://rinotaka84.com/2022/06/17/fractal-geometry-everywhere-nowhere-whenever-but-obscured/
Now, knowing it as rational problem-solving-process and his marvelous sense of exploration, I will add Mr. Brown as one of my teachers selfishly.

Yes, I have just found it wonderful the science is. In Japanese “Omoroy-yan”.

I know that there are some people who attempt to apply the theory of Brownian Motion to economy. Do they want to make a lot of money? In physics, it is utilized of course with other law of physics as basic conditions, such as conservation law. Do they put such condition on theory of economy? If an individual gains tremendous amount of money, then others cannot even get an amount sufficient for daily life. That is conservation law in economy, don’t you think? If Brownian Motion is applied to economy, then the system of economy should be equipped with conservation law. I am not communist rather supporting capitalism as driving force for human development, but at the same time, putting importance on equality and healthy wealth concentration and distribution.

Because of its nature, “random”, it would not allow any extreme wealth disparity, if it were a part of mechanism of economy, I just imagine.
Brownian Motion in this regard gives us an idea of how human should behave. Kind of , you know, “Freedom”, I suppose. Now getting drunk, my statement is getting like Brownian Motion, it seems.

Photo by cottonbro on Pexels.com

Lactose, its long time relation with human being

Lactose, a substance that is contained in milk. It provides nourishment with human and it is easy to obtain through domesticating mammals like cows or horses. However, it is not always a perfect thing for human.

Some people is tolerant to it, some are not. So called lactose intolerant is a typical issue for human eating habits. This lactose intolerance shows certain characteristic with geographical or human race distribution. In some areas, lactose intolerance is rare, in others it is frequent.

https://i0.wp.com/blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ex-lactoseintolerance-1125×692.jpg?resize=1125%2C692&ssl=1

This focus on nutrition winds around to what is the most nutritious food that would have been available to modern humans over the past five or ten thousand years. We finally come to the conclusion that milk is a well-balanced food that provides all three critical macromolecules—protein,

https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2017/11/07/talking-evolution-are-we-still-evolving/comment-page-1/

Typical state of lactose intolerance is stomach pain, diarrhea etc. A person who is intolerant to lactose experiences problem with digestion when the person takes milk.
The mechanism; the person does not have enzyme lactase that plays a role of breaking down it into glucose and galactose.

Anyway, there are certain people who is tolerant to lactose indeed. Why they can be ?Yes, on a whole, human became tolerant to lactose out of necessity throughout its evolution. Human attained the capability from their eating habit. For instance, some nomadic tribes take milk from their livestock. So, they naturally were able to adapt to lactose because milk was one of rare source of vital nutrition due to its relatively stable availability. If the tribes people cannot adapt it, they will lose a chance of survival.

How human body got aware that it is necessary to be tolerant? This function is basically programmed in human DNA, it seems. However, this DNA function have not always existed rather sometime in a past DNA mutated into such form somehow. Maybe some kind of signal was being transmitted to DNA so that DNA could sense the necessity of mutate it self, academics are still seeking the answer though.

In the footsteps of my lactose-intolerant ancestors

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/in-the-footsteps-of-my-lactose-intolerant-ancestors

So, for modern humans, that mechanism of “let DNA learn” is still working?

What if present food becomes not available anymore? Can we be adapted to another food which are not considered as food presently?

This kind of function might be of lessons-learned System of Lifeforms. This could be one of the key element of “Survival of Fittest”.
Is it involved by brain? How human brain can work with DNA in such a stabilized and rigorous manner?

Now a days, environment is rapidly changing. So, in a future, human might face a situation in which daily normal food is no more available and then a new type of food is sought nevertheless though DNA mutation for human to adapt to it is necessary.
Then new chemical substance will be developed, a kind of vaccination that can mutate DNA in a way that it can attain new function; “tolerant to a new type of food”.
Assuming that, in such a terrible era of food crisis, only available source of food is human droppings! Oh my god! Then special vaccination is developed ————-.
Can you eat it? Or else you choose the destiny of extinction?

Ok, let’s flee from such an extreme. DNA is learning it, means everyone is learning it. Therefore, By only evaluating an individual on the academic score or amount of income or family roots etc. can surely be of loss of possibility of the very survival of human being because nobody knows whose DNA can have it. Oh therefore, me myself maybe a special VIP for all human being like the fox in “The Little Prince” by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. Or else, if DNA eventually becomes driving force for human discriminations,
I will stand against it. I think lactose tells us that being individual is human freedom. It has given a person what has been necessary respectively for a long period of time.

Fractal Geometry, everywhere, nowhere, whenever but obscured

Fractal, mysterious but theorized as one of geometrics though many unknowns.
By far the most unique feature of all is so called Self-Similarity.
Its whole appearance or shape emerges when a part of the whole magnified again and if in the emerged shape a part is further magnified, then a similar shape is found again.

Self-Similarity

https://users.math.yale.edu/public_html/People/frame/Fractals/

More Examples of Self-Similarity

https://users.math.yale.edu/public_html/People/frame/Fractals/

Once being fascinated by it, inspiration may come to you, such as;
—– What if the universe is one of Fractal Geometries? Maybe then the issue of the conflict between Theory of Relativity and Quantum Theory could be settled by applying the concept of Fractal, perhaps?
—– Or, as often emerges in Fractal Geometry is shapes of something that gives impression of lifeform especially of a sort of plants, lifeforms are also ruled by self-similarity, isn’t it?

Space and Time, if it is properly quantized, maybe Fractal emerges or not?
In an instant of a past, the information of the space at that instant remains in a form of photons etc. If so then the infinite chain of those instants may possibly form a kind of self-similarity.

Turning to the idea of a relation between lifeform and fractal and attempting to find Fractal in the shape of lifeform, nevertheless the attempt will surely be of failure.
You see, if a part of lifeform is visually magnified by microscope, surely cells can be observed that is not self-similar to the lifeform at all.

Fractal in Human Body! No! Impossible!


Furthermore, by further magnifying it with such technique of bio-chemical can also be viewed is the famous Double Helix of DNA.

DNA contains design and fabrication drawings and specification data of lifeform, to put it another, it is information.

Fractal as structure of information, it could be!

Information! Yes, Yes, Yes! Appearance or “how the lifeform looks”, is also information. Therefore, if the same (or better expressed as “Similar”) information is reserved in DNA, this kind of relation can be considered as self-similarity and therefore as fractal, to some extent.

Oh No! Don’t take such a crazy leap! Calm down otherwise I will be scolded by specialist or academics in this field.

No, I continue stubbornly. let it go! (humming the phrase of that song)

So, how further can it be magnified? In fractal, self-similarity appears again and again.
Therefore, it should be so!

Yes! It is being hidden in a dimension or domain of “Spirit”.
There the essence of human spirit takes shape. The essence of course is also information.

Then what will be the next level?
Sorry, I don’t know. I am not specialist then. I am just being drunk.

Fractal Geometry does not convey exactly of physical appearance of something physical existence rather it might express some sort of fundamental, basic or essence such as law of physics, characteristics of life form etc. Theory of Relativity states that every single coordinate axis keeps the law of physics the same (similar?) as it is in any others, regardless of its motion. If the law of physics is considered as a kind of Geometry then it can be of self-similarity, I think.

Geometry in general can be considered as information, therefore even if direct appearance of things are different completely from each other, the information it contains could be similar to others and then if the integrated whole of the things forms a unit, the unit may be considered as Fractal.

Also, like DNA, each individual has its own DNA separately and independently. However if you see DNA as information then one DNA will never be independent of others, rather one surly be linked to others throughout or along with time, space or evolution process. That could be linked to concept of fractal, I feel it, if not having any proof though.

I’m having concern about development of Fractal Geometry. It caused once a sensation or impact on science and technology, however it has been somewhat gradually vanishing nowadays, it seems to me.
Perhaps to be accused is economy.

——– Just my illusion all the above statement is.

Fertilizer from Sahara to Amazon rainforest

To my surprise, they say the sand in Sahara desert is being transported to Amazon rainforest by wind.

NASA Satellite Reveals How Much Saharan Dust Feeds Amazon’s Plants

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/nasa-satellite-reveals-how-much-saharan-dust-feeds-amazon-s-plants

Sahara desert is considered as once was a dense forest millions years ago.
There are some theories for the reason why it turned into desert.
One of them is a theory of “Earth experienced a dangerous tilt in axis about 84 million years ago”. Because of that dynamic and huge scale of the impact, Sahara could not keep its forest.

The Sahara swings between ‘lush’ and ‘desert’ every 20,000 years, in sync with the Earth’s tilt

https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/sahara-desert-swings-earth-tilt-0423/

So, substances that were essential to vegetation became sand.

In a cave around Florida, stalactites and stalagmites are found, that contain a layer of ash content. By chemically analyzing the layer, something detected is specific chemical components that is likely originated from vegetation in Sahara.

Then the layer can represent when the layer was formed.
From this finding, they guessed that there might have been large scale forest fire in Sahara. The timing then is found to be consistent with the start of desertification.

I forgot the exact article from which I learned it but here put the similar one as reference.

Stalagmites Help Scientists Trace Ancient Wildfires

https://www.iflscience.com/physics/stalagmites-help-scientists-trace-ancient-wildfires/

African savanna was once a natural pasture field dense with grass for herbivores.
But the grass were almost lost, turning the field into savanna. Herbivores consumed the grass field into savanna.

So, what has recently been done by Human can also be the same as those done by nature. Therefore its only the matter of short term or long term, anyway eventually something would be lost after all. Then, why we have to preserve eco-system? It’s not necessary!

Oh ——– I am such an extremist!

Let’s see the difference between “By Human” and “By Nature”.

The example of Sahara, you see, its resource for sustaining bio-flourishing eco-system is now being transferred to Amazon rainforest. Maybe this flow of vitality is part of dynamic servo or feedback loop that is keeping any such shift within reversible balance..

Nature knows the precise balance for reversible.

In case of savanna, though an extent of grass field have disappeared, animals are surviving there. Maybe now balance between supply and demand have well been settled.
Probably, Nature knows here again “how”.

OK then, what about mass-extinction, our mother Earth have experienced so far?
Are they all being that balance state of reversible, or say sustainability?
After such mass-extinction, lifeform always were able to show its resilience. That’s why we are here on the earth right now.

All right, so if natural mass-extinction is permitted, then can another mass-extinction be allowed even if it is caused by human?

No matter how rapid the change is, everything destined to change and lost. Therefore, is there any point in keeping things as it is? Even if things get irreversible, being complete opposite of reversible state after natural mass-extinction, nevertheless there is nothing being forever. So, we do not need to care about anything like balance or reversible or sustainable.

I disagree with myself!

What matters most is our bond with nature. If we do not care about it then we will lose the meaning of ourselves. Nnnnnnn, I can’t have clear idea of justifying the superiority of “By Nature” against “By Human”. It’s like justifying the meaning of life like something conveyed by Albert Camus. Maybe the bond are the rock of Sisyphe.

Sorry Mr. Albert Camus, I just refer to your great work in this kind of idle talk.

Today, the theme of this article is now getting quite a bothering but I am able to insist that I love nature as presently is so I do not want to lose it, in my life at least, the beauty of nature found in Amazon Rainforest, Sahara Desert, Savanna field etc.

Oh another sip of sake can be the only salvation to me.
(Don’t drink too much of it anyway L.O.L)

Track Down the Evolutionally Mutations of Whales and Human

It can easily be tracked down; the evolutionally mutations of whales.
You can just put fossils or specimens of cetaceans (whales) along the time axis in an order from the oldest to the present. Then you can see the animation movie of the evolution of whales with the millions or billions of time span compressed in just a few seconds.

Starting from 4 (four) legged land animal, you can observe the appearance of the series of fossils continuously mutates; the legs get short, fingers closes and unified into fin like shape, hind legs turned into something of dolphin. So detailed and tangible is the geometrical relations and links between a fossil and the next in a time period that there is no doubt that whales evolved from land animal.

On the other hand, human, tracking down its evolutionally mutation is not so clear, it seems, as there are some academics who are still seeking fossils that depict the gradual shift of geometrical shape. Between Neanderthal and Modern Human any fossils have not been found which could represent the gradual evolutionally mutation throughout such a long period of time as millions.

Therefore, the biological mutation of human from Neanderthal to Modern Human happened in an instantaneously like metamorphosis. Oh!!!!!! What a great theory it can be!

Oh my god! Wait! Such a crazy some idea! How could that happened, can you see?!
Is that a new Hollywood movie titled “Theory Impossible!”?

It was around 20 years ago when I was working power plant construction project in Australia, one of my Australian colleagues said, “I seriously believe that human is originated from space”. Then I said, “OK, tell me the point”.
“Yes, there are no fully convincing evidence in understanding that modern human originates from such animals like apes. I think that long time ago, somewhere in prehistoric era, multiple races of extraterrestrials landed on the Earth and settled in several locations that’s why now we see many races in the world”, he firmly declared.

Note: in this article, any effect of alcohol is neglected, like friction force in mechanical physics for some beginners.

Having been stimulated with his transcendence theory, I developed another drunken hallucination. (Though another voice in my spirit said; “Don’t !”)

At that time, a single race of extraterrestrial found this beautiful Earth and thought that they want to live on the planet instead of being confined further in their space-habitat because there is no such beautiful thing as ones being on the Earth in their habitat, in spite of almost perfect and flawless functioning of the system of the space habitat with their ultimately advanced science and technology.

However then, they felt sad with a fact that they can never directly land on and live on the Earth because their DNA can never adapt to the Earth. To have DNA adapted, the DNA must experience long period of DNA functioning in the very environment of the Earth. It’s like trying to speak mother tongue in another country where there is no translator nor interpreter nor any knowledge that can connect together the two languages.

Anyway, so advanced is their science and technology that they found quite a surprising solution. “Why don’t we synthesize new DNA from both DNAs?” “One from ours, the other from Neanderthal’s.” They were quite being respectful of the DNA on the Earth with its long time development process, which can never be substituted with another one therefore the only way they can realize the same capability was to share the power rather than newly generating something another.

The newly synthesized DNA was applied somehow in Neanderthals reproduction system and, The new race, that would be the ultimate ancestor of modern human, was borne.

This is the very reason that evolutionally mutation process of human cannot be traced along time axis while for whales it can be.

Oops!, I did it again———-.

But, such things as racism, war, etc. are all inferior to my illusion, don’t you think?

Entropy, world order and system

It was around 40 years ago, when I read that legendary book (to me though) “Entropy”.
The author is Jeremy Rifkin.

In the book being argued is, I slightly remember, that if solar power is to be the fundamental basis of our energy system, the system of social and economy should be changed to something of decentralized because solar power, as it is toward natural flora and fauna, is a type of decentralized system.

Sunlight over the mother earth is not the sort of laser beam nor burning fire in furnace.
It is always providing sufficient amount but not being in a manner of concentrated for any life forms, well equally distributed to anything that need to thrive.

Plants need it, for photosynthesis in order to gain starch that is the energy reserve.
Then animals can collect it by eating plants.
Plants, there are a lot of types in a woods or forest well dispersed through extended area, where sunlight is falling over like drizzling rain.

By contrast, some kinds of power system like thermal power plant or nuclear are the system of centralization and therefore it can well fit capitalism and inclination of population to concentrate in urban area.

Everything has its own limit is quantity and therefore that way of concentration has almost reached to the limit in an accelerating manner causing issues of environment and sustainability, say, issues of Carbone-Free, SDG, etc.

One of the solution, some specialists are suggesting, is solar power but then those contexts in the above implicates that as well as energy source the economical and social system should also be “adapted” to the nature of solar energy.

So, does anyone know such approach of changing economy and social formation into something that could well fit renewable energy like solar? Or if the present solutions being offered are just an extension to the present “rudimentary” one, maybe we will be easy prey to entropy.

Thinking of modern network technology, integration or concentration of people’s knowledge, consciousness, communication whatsoever can be established without a sort of physical system while each single value can also be respected like plants in forest. If the identification of what is to be concentrated and what is to be decentralized is done in a sophisticated manner, then solar power can well be fit into our life.

Honestly saying, the direction of SDG etc. currently being observed looks not toward that way.

War in Ukraine alike was caused by, to some extent, the negative effect of entropy. After the WWII, the world, it looked so at that time, established well organized minimum entropy state in the world order. Then it has recently been found that the world have not kept the entropy low so far, allowing Russians to start such devastating and stupide war.

So, energy and environment system could also plunge into such increase of entropy because, as we see in that war, human still placing the priority on conserving the rudimentary system rather than leaping toward minimizing entropy.

Anyway, this is just an opinion of ignorance who is pretending to be a scientist.

Message from Kaluza to Einstein  

He suggested to Einstein that space-time would be composed of five dimensions while Einstein was stating that space-time would be four dimensional.

Einstein said that normal space is three dimensional. That is typically expressed in mathematics as X, Y and Z.

Then one more dimension should be added. “Time”.

One day, one mathematician whose name was not so known well among academics at that time sent a short thesis to Einstein. There being described was general relativity based on not 4 dimensions but 5 dimensions that happened to reach Maxwellian equations for electromagnetism.

Einstein then encouraged him to publish the theory which later is developed into Kaluza–Klein theory. Klein is a Swedish theoretical physicist. They developed the theory.

Yes, at that time, Gravity was getting closer to Electro-Magnetism.

But, it was like small fire suddenly blight burned but then disappeared somehow. Instead, being left was excitement among academics seeking quantum mechanics. Until theory of string emerges, the idea of adding further dimension had been in hibernation.

Now a days, physics is quite a complicating thing but it also looks (to me) that physics has come to a deadlock. May be here the present being required is an idea, innovative and not deeply be “contaminated” one.

Like The Laws of Thought by George Boole, which now is the fundamental of computerized system, some ideas quietly and modestly alive may finally be of salvation to modern physics.

Today, my story is quite fell short of in terms of both length and consideration thus if someone who is professional in the field of physics read this, please just leave me as I am. I am just an innocent science-fiction-loving ordinally middle aged man.

Finally, I have to leave here a short statement for Ukrainian people.
Although nobody could stop it, we have to at least continue thinking of the way that can eliminate any form of war. At least we can say that some persons who are taking the situation seriously have started thinking of how to create peaceful world.

King Solomon’s Ring (by Konrad Lorenz), Ukraine, Russia and the world order

In the book, found in its afterword is a short comment on human being by Mr. Lorenz, the author of the book. The comment, I can slightly remember but not exactly, states something about concerns over the human being who now posses mass destructive weapon.

He is an ethologist.
His concern is, whether human being can control such power of mass destructive weapon like wolves do.

Wolves form a herd and sometimes a young wolf challenges the leader of the herd.
But, often the young one is overpowered by the leader. In the final point of the conflict or say the battle between them, the challenging is put to end with the ferocious jaws of the leader freezing at its position posing the finish-bite around the neck of the challenger.
The leader anyway never bite the neck.

Losing a member of the herd means losing some extent of capability of hunting a prey.
But at the same time, hierarchy should be kept consistently and firmly.

Here then another type of animal. A kind of deer, (I forgot the name ….. ) which does not form herd in wild circumstance.
If some of the deer are put in a fenced area, a male starts killing all the other deer including female and fawn with its own horn.

In wild circumstance, the deer are well spread in a wide area keeping distance with others in a way that there is no competition over food.
But once the distances are no longer kept in that manner, food competition is inevitable.
So reasoned as above is the behavior of the male, in ethological theory.

We human being need others. If we put the above theory of wolves on us then, how the description of Ukraine war can be?

Russian so far have not killed all the Ukrainian people while demonstrating its power.
Is this situation the same as the chief of the wolves do?

No, No! No!, never be the same!

OK then, if Russian just had threatened Ukraine by demonstrating huge armed forces assembled ready for war at the border of the countries, would the war not have broken out? Like wolf chief with its jaw poised to bite.

No, No! No! again never!

OK then, Could Russian be allowed to kill Ukrainian completely so that any competitions over something is eliminated, like that story of deer as Mr. Lorenz exemplified?

OK, no more, that’s impossible, me myself, such a fool!

First of all, human being can never be the same as those wild animals.
The way, so called war, no more fits to this globalized world.
If Mr. Lorenz examined modern human behavior in a way any ethologists do, then he would say, human now have thrown away the method “war”.
He would say, killing people by the name of war does not match with wolf’s jaw or deer’s horn.

We human being now has reached an area beyond ethology.

Mr. Lorenz, please tell us how to built a world order that can completely eliminate any form of war. We could not find any clues from your fascinating studies rather are still being in vain.

War is Purely Crime

Today, I still can’t talk about science. How sad the present state is!

Arguments are being exchanged, tangled, and then have not yet been concluded.

Nobody could not stop it. And they say he is criminal because of murder cases there found reportedly. The number of the cases and the way of it matters. They say.

But, hey! Wait!

Normally, whatever the reason is, murder is absolute criminal act.
But, the word “war” means murder in the name of a country, I think.
Any justification should not be given to it even if it is committed in the name of a country.

Japan also once committed it unfortunately. But, nevertheless now we Japanese are trying to convince the world of how bad war should be, because we have been educated that how bad it had been, not only in classroom but also from society whole and from our parents.

In 21st century, because of wide spread education on history and concepts of modern peaceful and wealthier society, there will be no such things as war, at least in the way that Russians are doing there, ———- at least I have believed so until ——–.

In any case, I am thinking of, in vain though, a possibility of establishing new system that can prevent war from starting so that no casualty is found at all, because —– whenever I start thinking of it, my theory in my mind collapses, facing deadlock always, finally in my mind murmuring “Impossible” silently.